ABSTRACT
Introduction: One in five pregnant women in the UKis obese. Obesity is associated with increased risk of both maternal and foetal adverse outcomes. RCOG guidelines [1] recommend that all women with a booking BMI over 40 kg/m2 should be reviewed antenatally by a senior obstetric anaesthetist to guide risk assessment, medical optimisation and shared decision-making. The 2021 MBRRACE report [2] recommends that all women should be reweighed in the third trimester for accurate VTE risk scoring and prophylactic LMWH dosing. In our institution, reconfiguration of hospital areas as part of the COVID-19 response led to loss of designated clinic space for our obstetric anaesthetic clinic. As a result, our practice since has been to initially offer a telephone consultation followed by a face-to-face review if needed. Finding space for the latter has often been a significant logistical challenge. Our project sought to assess whether our practice continued to meet national standards in the wake of these changes. Method(s): Following audit approval, we retrospectively reviewed all women with a BMI >40 kg/m2 undergoing caesarean section (CS) over a six-month period (1/4/22 to 31/9/22). Result(s): 20 women met inclusion criteria (Category 1-3 CS - 12 women;Category 4 CS - 8 women). 100% of patients had booking height, weight and BMI recorded. 20% (4/20) of patients were reweighed in the 3rd trimester. Only 55% (11/20) of patients had been referred to and reviewed in the antenatal obstetric anaesthetic clinic (Figure). Of the 11 patients referred, 6 were referred later than 30 weeks. Of the 9 patients not referred, 8 had a BMI between 40 and 45 kg/m2. By contrast, 87% (6/7) of patients with BMI over 45 kg/m2 were referred and seen. Discussion(s): Our audit showed that we are not meeting national standards. Possible reasons identified were lack of awareness of the RCOG standards and referral criteria (especially for women with a BMI of 40 to 45 kg/m2) and logistical issues in undertaking face-to-face reviews without designated clinic space. Presentation of our results at the joint anaesthetic, obstetric and midwifery governance meeting has helped identify space in the antenatal clinic for face-to-face reviews, to start from March 2023 and to raise awareness of the national standards to ensure referral of all women with a BMI over 40 kg/m2. A reaudit is planned in 6 months. [Figure presented]Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Frimley Park Hospital criteria for referral to High-Risk Obstetric Anaesthetic Clinic (HROAC) included all parturients with BMI > 40. The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated HROAC becoming virtual. It was still possible to discuss risk and assess patients' airways, but not to reliably assess the likely ease of neuraxial techniques or cannulation. Observationally, little useful clinical information was gained, and airway problems rarely noted. An audit was planned to assess how often clinically useful information about the women's airways was gained during appointments. Method(s): HROAC database search for women referred with BMI > 40 with estimated date of delivery 20/04/20-03/04/21 to see whether any airway difficulties were predicted (Mallampati 3 or 4;limited neck movement;jaw slide B or C;limited mouth opening). Result(s): 82 women had BMI > 40, of which 3 were assessed as having a potentially difficult airway: two had BMI > 50 and one had retrognathism causing difficult airway prediction unrelated to her BMI of 41.7. One woman, BMI 58.7, was assessed as having a straightforward airway but her notes revealed her airway had been challenging to intubate in the past. One was assessed in video consultation as straightforward but an airway assessment during admission at the end of her previous pregnancy was Mallampti 3. Five women declined a video consultation. Discussion(s): In view of the minimal gain of clinically useful information and the routine presence of difficult airway kit for the obstetric emergency theatre, it was deemed safe and more relevant to make airway and neuraxial assessments on admission to labour ward rather than in the antenatal clinic for women with BMI<50. The assessment would therefore be made by the duty trainee anaesthetist who would be responsible for managing the patient, thus facilitating appropriate planning and communication if a woman with a challenging airway was identified. It is therefore also made at the very end of pregnancy when weight gain and its impact on airway is likely to be at its maximum. This approach, in conjunction with an antenatal information leaflet, and the ability of any obstetrician to refer to the HROAC, complies with the need for timely assessment of women as required by GPAS [1]. By formalising the assessment of women with high BMI on the labour ward it is hoped that patient safety and planning can be maximised.Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Critically-ill obstetric patients admitted to general intensive care units (ICU) are a rare and unique population for whom excellent care is essential to prevent devastating physical and psychological morbidity. Admissions are often unanticipated and can present challenges to obstetric and intensive care MDTs. 2018 Enhanced Maternal Care (EMC) Guidelines provide standards for caring for these women, and the 2022 Ockenden review exposed the association of peripartum ICU admission with undertreated psychological trauma and a desire for individualised debriefing [1,2]. We audited the care of obstetric admissions to general ICUs in our quaternary centre. We sought evidence of psychological morbidity to improve follow-up pathways in line with 2022 Ockenden actions. Method(s): Retrospective online case note review of maternity admissions to general ICUs between 1/1/2021-1/1/2022 compared to EMC audit standards. Exclusion criteria: <22/40 gestation, >6/52 postpartum and admissions to our level 2 labour ward high dependency unit. Result(s): 25 patients were admitted to general ICUs over 12 months. Median age was 35-39 years, mean parity was 1. The commonest indication was obstetric haemorrhage (n = 10). 15 of 25 patients required level 3 care, median length of stay was 1.5 days. Documentation of daily obstetric MDT ward round was variable, as was mother-baby contact. 0 of 25 women were seen in obstetric anaesthesia clinic after discharge, only 1 received outpatient ICU follow-up. 50% of postnatal admissions (n = 14) had documentation of significant psychological distress. In response a local checklist was developed with key colleagues to support collaborative working and standardise quality care. It includes automatic referral into obstetric anaesthesia clinic and access to a novel perinatal mental health service. Discussion(s): A peripartum admission to ICU is highly likely to be experienced as traumatic [2]. The incidence of obstetric ICU admissions may increase in the context of greater clinical complexity of the UK pregnant population and COVID-19, whilst the non-anaesthetic ICU workforce may have little obstetric training. Obstetric anaesthetists are therefore uniquely skilled to facilitate quality resuscitation and referral to ICU, but gold-standard holistic care extends beyond admission. We believe regular audit and dedicated local care pathways which incorporate proactive debriefing and psychological health can improve the care of this important group of women.Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd
ABSTRACT
Aim: The Cirujanos en Accion and Hernia International foundations carried out their own and collaborative surgical campaigns in developing countries. In 2020 and 2021 the programme had to be suspended due to Covid. In 2022 we restarted our actions, analysed the difficulties of reactivation and described the campaigns that had been carried out and those that had to be delayed. Material/ Methods: We describe the 9 campaigns of Surgeons in Action, our own and in collaboration with Hernia International and our own campaign to the region of Naborno Karabakh, planned for September and cancelled 24 hours before departure due to the resurgence of armed conflict. An analysis is made of volunteers, places, type (adults or children or mixed), collaborations with other foundations, patients operated and procedures done according to pathologies, integration with local staff with exchange of knowledge. Result(s): Made in 8 countries (Benin, Camerun, Gambia (2), Kenya, Liberia, Mozambique, Tanzania, Sierra Leone) and postponed in one country, the Naborno Karabakh region of Armenia. 85 volunteers (25 general and 10 paediatric surgeons, 19 anaesthetists, 3 intensivists, 23 nurses, 5 audiovisuals);local staff;1144 patients (473 children, 671 adults), 1325 procedures for various pathologies (hernias, goitres, hydroceles, undescendend testis, soft tissue tumours, etc.) Conclusion(s): 9 campaigns have been carried out successfully and new locations have been opened with a good projection for the coming years, and we have experienced difficulties with the cancellation of a mega-campaign in an area with geopolitical conflicts - to be taken into account in the future.
ABSTRACT
Background: In the light of post severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) Pneumonias playing a role in the long-term respiratory complications in patients subsequently involved in trauma, a study was conducted to assess the post COVID-19 Pneumonias on the prognosis of trauma patients in a Tertiary care Hospital of Telangana. Aim of the Study: To identify the post COVID-19 pneumonia and respiratory complications, their severity, factors affecting the management of trauma patients and the long-term sequelae. Materials: 42 patients categorized on American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) injury scoring scales were included. Patients aged between 18 and 70 years were included. Patients with previous history of post COVID-19 lung disease for 09 months or above were included. Pulmonary function tests like FEV1, FVC, TLC and DLCO were performed and analyzed. The CT scan signs were based on the involvement of the lung parenchyma as: Normal CT (no lesion), minimal (0-10%), moderate (11-25%), important (26-50%), severe (51-75%), and critical (>75%). Result(s): 42 patients with trauma with either COVID-19 disease affecting the lungs or RTPCR positive were included. There were 29 (69.04%) male patients and 13 (30.95%) female patients with a male to female ratio of 2.23:1. The mean age among the men was 41.55+/-3.25 years and 38.15+/-4.10 years in female patients. There were 33/42 patients with positive RTPCR test and 09/42 were negative for RTPCR test for COVID-19. Conclusion(s): Recovery from COVID-19 disease especially with lung parenchyma changes during the active state has shown to affect adversely the morbidity of post trauma surgeries. Preoperative assessment of Lung function tests such as FEV1, FVC, TLC and DLCO would guide the surgeon and the anesthetist in the surgical management of such patients.Copyright © 2023, Dr Yashwant Research Labs Pvt Ltd. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is important in the management of major, life-threating, and treatment-resistant psychiatric illness. The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly disrupted ECT services. The need for new infection control measures, staff/resource redeployment and shortages, and the perception that ECT is as an 'elective' procedure have caused changes to, and reductions in, ECT delivery. The aim of this study was to explore the impacts of COVID-19 on ECT services, staff, and patients globally. Method(s): Data were collected using an electronic, mixed-methods, cross-sectional survey. The survey was open March to November 2021. Clinical directors in ECT services, their delegates, and anaesthetists were asked to participate. Quantitative findings are reported. Result(s): One hundred and twelve participants worldwide completed the survey. The study identified significant impacts on services, staff, and patients. Based on quantitative results, most participants (57.8%, n=63) reported their services made at least one change to ECT delivery. More than three-quarters (81.0%, n=73) reported their service had identified at least one patient who could not access ECT. More than two-thirds (71.4%, n=67) reported their service identified at patients who experienced a relapse in their psychiatric illness due to lack of ECT access. Six participants (7.6%) reported their service had identified at least one patient who died, by suicide or other means, due to lack of ECT access. Participants' qualitative responses were detailed, averaging 43 words. Three qualitative themes were identified: (1) Service provision, about the importance of ECT services continuing during the pandemic, (2) Preparedness, through guidelines and environmental design, and (3) Personal protection, about strategies to increase staff safety. Conclusion(s): This is the first multi-site, international survey to explore the impacts of COVID-19 on ECT services, staff, and patients. Its findings can be used to inform evidence-based ECT practice. This supports the ongoing safe, effective operation of ECT services. Research Category and Technology and Methods Clinical Research: 2. Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) Keywords: Survey, Mixed Methods, COVID, Service changes;Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
This is a case report of a 74-year-old woman with catatonic schizophrenia who was treated with transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) in place of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) during the Covid-19 pandemic that impacted access to ECT facilities. In 2021, the exceptional number of patients infected with SARS-Cov-2 led the French public hospital system to adjust its organization, temporarily redirecting anesthetists from ECT departments to ICUs. Our patient, who was hospitalized via the emergency department, presented schizophrenia with catatonic features. Due to the pandemic, ECT, which is considered the gold standard treatment for this condition, was not available. Therefore, tDCS, a neuromodulation technique that doesn't require general anesthesia, was recommended for this patient, and was delivered at the relatively (compared to standard protocols) accelerated rate of five sessions a day, five days a week. This protocol was chosen as accelerated rTMS had been shown to be effective against depression in recent trials (Cole et al. 2021), and one study had also reported this exact protocol as effective and harmless for a patient with schizophrenia (Mondino et al. 2021). The Bush-Francis Catatonia Rating Scale (BFCRS) was used to evaluate the severity of the catatonia. After 49 sessions, the clinical response was meaningful, with a BFCRS score of 16, compared to 36 at baseline. We then moved to five sessions a day, three days a week, and then two days a week. After 80 sessions, we noted the complete disappearance of catatonia (BFCRS = 6). This case provides evidence for the feasibility and tolerability of accelerated tDCS for patients with catatonia. Accelerated tDCS represents a potential alternative to ECT in the treatment of catatonia, and needs further randomized clinical studies to confirm its efficacy. Research Category and Technology and Methods Clinical Research: 9. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Keywords: tdcs, catatonia, covid-19, ECTCopyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
Background: Anaesthetists are frontline workers who perform aerosol-generating procedures (AGPs) in enclosed environments, which exposes them to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and increases their risk of contracting SARS-CoV-2 infection and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This study describes the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the academic department of anaesthesiology of the University of the Witwatersrand prior to vaccination. Method(s): A cross-sectional, contextual, descriptive research design, using an anonymous electronic questionnaire, was followed in the study. Consecutive and convenience sampling methods were used. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Result(s): A total of 147 participants met the inclusion criteria. There were 90 (61.22%) females and 57 (38.78%) males. The mean age was 35.26 years for the 36 participants who tested positive (26.47%) for SARS-CoV-2. Hospital admission was required by 2.78% of participants with COVID-19. Male participants had a higher prevalence of having SARS-CoV-2 infection (p = 0.045). There were no statistically significant associations between SARS-CoV-2 infection and pregnancy (p = 0.09), asthma (p = 0.11), autoimmune disease (p = 0.77), obesity (p = 0.9), diabetes (p = 0.96), hypertension (p = 0.9) and smoking (p = 0.69). Commonly reported COVID-19-like symptoms included fatigue (68.33%), headaches (61.67%) and myalgia (58.33%). Of the participants with a positive SARS-CoV-2 test, 38.46% had reported travelling within 14 days of testing positive (p < 0.001). Community exposure to a person with SARS-CoV-2 was associated with participants contracting SARS-CoV-2 infection (p = 0.001). Conclusion(s): AGPs are not a significant risk factor for anaesthetists in the context of work or community transmission of the virus. There was a statistically significant predisposition for contracting SARS-CoV-2 infection among males, participants who travelled and participants who had community exposure to a SARS-CoV-2 infected person.
ABSTRACT
Single use flexible bronchoscopes (SUFBs) have come to the forefront in the COVID-19 pandemic to minimise risk of infectious transmission as well as carry out bedside procedures for critically unwell patients. Multiple companies have released SUFBs with varying technical metrics. We hypothesised that clinician bronchoscope preference varies depending on physical characteristics and level of experience. 39 participants including physicians, surgeons and anaesthetists with a range of expertise from first time endoscopists to consultants took part in a trial of all available SUFBs (The Surgical Company (TSC) Broncoflex©, Boston Scientific©, Ambu©, Vathin©, Pentax© prototype scope). Likert scales were used to evaluate scope parameters including ergonomics, comfort and ease of procedures. Participant parameters were collected including height, gender and hand size. TSC Broncoflex © was the preferred scope overall with ratings of 82% for ergonomics and 83% for usage. Female participants preferred Pentax (p=0.04);male participants preferred TSC (p=0.04). Participants with small or medium glove size preferred Pentax (p=0.02) while those with large glove size ranked Vathin and TSC highest. Doctors with >10 years experience preferred Pentax (p=0.04). Gender, hand size and previous experience influenced scope preference. These factors should be considered in future scope development.
ABSTRACT
At Whipps Cross Hospital, multi-morbid (high-risk) patients undergoing urological surgery are routinely listed on the surgical inpatient pathway. The 'Getting it right first time' [1] review of anaesthesia recommended day-case surgery as the default for suitable procedures, to help with waiting lists as well as to provide patients with a safe environment. To improve patient choice and postoperative outcomes, an ambulatory spinal pathway was piloted. Methods An earlier scoping exercise identified a pool of urology high-risk patients who could potentially benefit from an ambulatory spinal pathway. Based on this, prilocaine use for ambulatory spinal anaesthetic was provisionally approved by the drugs and therapeutic committee. A pilot ambulatory pathway was put in place, which helped identify suitable patients. The pilot pathway was limited to a select group of anaesthetists to minimise variations. Postoperatively, patients were followed up at 3 and 24 h and assessed for postoperative nausea, vomiting, pain, mobilisation, neurological symptoms and cognitive impairment. Results The total number of patients was 19. Mean ASA was 2.9. Average age was 74 years. The mean dose of hyperbaric prilocaine 2% used was 2.9 ml, 21% of cases utilised additional intrathecal additives. Regarding intra-operative analgesia, only paracetamol was used in 15% of cases. There were no conversions to general anaesthetic. The most common procedure was a cystoscopy with or without biopsy (42%). With comorbidities, diabetes mellitus was the most common (58%), followed by cardiac disease (53%) and respiratory disease (42%). At 3 h, 100% of patients were eating and all sensation had returned, 0% had cognitive impairment, 47% were sitting out and 42% mobilising. Sixteen per cent had hypotension and 5% had pain at rest. At 24 h, 0% had cognitive impairment, 50% had required analgesia and 84% were mobilising. All patients reported they would have a spinal anaesthetic again in the future. Discussion With an ageing population, who have multiple comorbidities, there is huge benefit regarding providing the choice of a spinal anaesthetic rather than general anaesthetic, which allows patients to go home the same day. This will not only provide financial savings to the service provider but also help clear the backlog of surgeries due to the COVID-19 pandemic and enhance patient recovery.
ABSTRACT
Evidence shows videolaryngoscopy (VL) creates a safe atmosphere for tracheal intubations by reducing failed intubations and increasing first-pass success [1]. In 2017, University College London Hospital was one of the first hospitals in the UK to roll out VL to all anaesthetic areas to promote patient safety at a time of increased airway complexity cases. We aim to compare staff attitudes about VL at the time of introduction and 3-years later. Methods We sent online surveys to anaesthetists of all grades before and after the introduction of VL. We had over 90 responses to both surveys. Results Our survey results show that anaesthetists are becoming more in favour of VL with > 93% supporting their use. They show 78% gave VL a maximum +5 on the Likert scale;this is an increase from 59% in the initial survey. It indicates that > 88% perceive VL to promote patient safety, improve quality of care, help in training and improve team dynamics of the intubation process. We see overwhelming support for their use in COVID-19 patients with only 1% of survey respondents having negative views. Subjective responses show that clinicians perceived VL to add 'patient and operator safety'. This is due to 'increased distance of operator from the airway';'reducing anticipated infection risk' and 'improving ease of intubation in the hypoxic patient'. They also feel that VL helps 'share a mental model with the team when other aspects of communication are impaired by PPE'. Our surveys demonstrate fewer concerns with VL over the 3-year period. The results show that concerns amongst anaesthetists with regard to training and familiarity had dropped from 33% to 25%. Concerns over the use of single-use equipment had decreased from 81% to 66%, and concerns regarding documentation of VL intubation grades dropped from 59% to 38%;however, there remains a small but noticeable increase in concern over the loss of direct laryngoscopy skills amongst junior anaesthetists from 55% to 64%. Discussion Our surveys demonstrate a department-wide change in attitude that favours the use of VL. Crucially, clinicians feel that VL provides a strong positive patient safety effect and promotes shared decision-making at a time when rare catastrophic events such as unrecognised oesophageal intubation still occur. The pandemic has proven to be a major catalyst for their increased use and familiarity, which is likely to propel the widespread use of VL in the future.
ABSTRACT
During 2020, updated guidelines for management of malignant hyperthermia (MH) were published. These guidelines now recommend the use of activated charcoal filters [1]. We suspected that the disruption and redistribution of staff and resources during the coronavirus pandemic may have resulted in staff being unaware of these updated guidelines, threatening the ability of a theatre team to respond effectively to a MH crisis. We implemented a quality-improvement project to rectify this. Methods Prior knowledge of the updated guidelines, location of emergency equipment (activated charcoal filters, dantrolene and printed copies of guidelines) and confidence in using activated charcoal filters was established by online questionnaire. We subsequently designed and delivered a 'tea trolley' teaching session to theatre staff (Fig. 1). Teaching sessions were evaluated with an electronic survey. Results Fifty-nine theatre staff responded to the initial questionnaire, with 39% stating they had read and understood the new MH guidelines. Forty-four per cent of respondents were unsure whether our Trust had access to activated charcoal filters, with only 20% knowing where the nearest supply was kept and 14% saying they would be confident using the filters. We subsequently delivered 'tea trolley' teaching to 73 theatre staff (including 28 anaesthetists, 15 operating department practitioners and 24 members of nursing staff) across several weeks, to demonstrate safe usage of activated charcoal filters and dantrolene in an emergency. Feedback was excellent, with all agreeing that their confidence and knowledge had increased. Discussion The multiple benefits of 'tea trolley' training have been documented widely [2] and subsequently established in many departments. Departmental disruption due to the pandemic response and ongoing clinical pressures as we attempt to recover our services can lead to staff working in unfamiliar areas. We suggest that 'tea trolley' teaching should be utilised in ensuring comprehensive knowledge of updated emergency guidelines and equipment, and have shown that it is an excellent method of embedding emergency preparedness. (Figure Presented).
ABSTRACT
In 2019, the North East Anaesthesia Sustainable Healthcare (NEASH) Network was formed. Its aim is to encourage coordinated sustainability efforts. We comprise over 80 anaesthetists with representatives in every Trust in our region. The NHS accounts for 4% of UK carbon emissions. Two per cent of NHS emissions come solely from anaesthetic gases. In late 2020, we began a region-wide project to raise awareness of the environmental impact of general anaesthesia (GA) with the aim of reducing emissions throughout our geographical area. Methods NEASH performed a snapshot audit of 1 full week's GA data in early 2021. Consumed volatile agent, nitrous oxide (N2O) and total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) were converted into kilograms of carbon dioxide equivalents (kg CO2e) [1, 2]. Each Trust's emissions were divided by total GA time giving kg CO2e per hour (kg CO2e.h-1), allowing efficiency comparison between sites. We presented our results and the following messages to each Trust. Firstly, stop using desflurane and use N2O only when essential as these agents have the highest global warming potential (GWP). Secondly, we encouraged sevoflurane use as it has the lowest GWP of volatiles (followed by isoflurane);low fresh gas flows are essential. Thirdly, consider TIVA, as its GWP is lower than volatile GA. Although outside the scope of our audit, we reminded colleagues that local or regional anaesthesia have a lower CO2e than GA. In early 2022, we re-audited to assess the impact of our messages. Results The results of 5340 h of GA data are displayed in the table below. Discussion Due to increased operating post-COVID-19 and the inclusion of a hospital that was unable to participate in round 1, round 2 contained 787 more hours of data. Despite this, emissions of CO2e were 12.83 t lower, demonstrating an average hourly emission reduction of 61.1%. This was mainly driven by reduced desflurane and N2O use. Two hospitals in our region have since decommissioned N2O manifolds and two others are undertaking this process. Region-wide procurement data obtained by NEASH showed that three hospitals have ceased ordering desflurane. TIVA use remained broadly the same, which may be due to a lack of availability of equipment. This region-wide project is easily reproducible nationwide and could make significant contributions towards NHS net zero. (Table Presented).
ABSTRACT
Peri-operative intravenous paracetamol use has not been shown to be superior to oral administration in a randomised controlled trial looking at postoperative pain [1]. The use of intravenous paracetamol carries a wellrecognised increased financial and environmental cost compared to oral paracetamol. We audited the use of paracetamol in patients attending theatre at a district general hospital and propose a method to increase premedication with oral paracetamol. Methods We retrospectively audited the notes of all patients who underwent an elective surgical procedure in theatres, across a 5-day period at a district general hospital. Data regarding the use of paracetamol were collected. Patients who were already an inpatient and those having surgery under local anaesthetic alone were excluded. Results Forty-seven patients were included, five of whom had a spinal and 42 a general anaesthetic with representation from six different surgical specialities. Five of the patients included were under 18 years. Thirty-seven patients received paracetamol peri-operatively. Thirty-four patients received only intravenous paracetamol, two patients received oral paracetamol and one patient received both due to length of time between preoperative oral dose and surgery. Ten patients did not receive any paracetamol. No patients included had a documented allergy or contraindication to paracetamol. Discussion Our department recognised the financial and environmental benefits associated with oral pre-medication. Although many of these anaesthetists would prefer to prescribe pre-operative analgesia, the data indicate that there are barriers that prevent prescription and/or administration. As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, elective orthopaedic surgery with an enhanced recovery protocol including the use of oral paracetamol premedication, was underrepresented in our data. Previous encouragement to prescribe oral premedication has produced good, short-term results but does not appear to provide long-lasting change. We propose a Patient Group Directive for the administration of pre-operative oral paracetamol by the admitting nurse on arrival to the pre-operative ward. We anticipate that this will both standardise and embed oral paracetamol premedication into the department and will therefore provide long-term change.
ABSTRACT
During the COVID-19 pandemic, multiple guidelines have been issued on hospital safety and protection measures to prevent transmission to healthcare workers and to other patients. The operating room is a high-risk environment where enhanced precautions are required. The guidelines differ and practical implementation between hospitals can also vary, according to interpretation and budget. Staff at risk may question if the local policies are sufficient and correct. This article provides an overview and theoretical background to the additional safety measures required in the operating room during a viral pandemic like the COVID-19 pandemic. This may serve as a touchstone and tool for anesthetists and OR managers. Copyright © 2020 ARSMB-KVBMG. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: the recent covid19 pandemic is not devoid of psychological risks on paramedical staff. Among them, those who work in the operating theaters are exposed to such risks. Objective(s): to determine the perceived stress level and the psychological impact of COVID-19 on paramedics in the operating room. Method(s): This is an observational, descriptive and analytical study carried out in the operating rooms of Sahloul University Hospital during a 3 month period. The data collection tool was a selfadministered questionnaire composed of 5 main parts (sociodemographic characteristics, occupational characteristics, exposure to COVID-19, the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) and the Hospital Anxiety and depression scale (HADS)). Result(s): 96 paramedical staff participated in our study. The average perceived stress score was significantly higher among anesthetists. 48% of participants had anxiety. Anesthetists had significantly higher anxiety scores (p = 0.001). 26.1% of participants had definite depression. Of those with definite depression, 35.3% were anesthetists (p = 0.028). Factors significantly associated with the occurrence of anxiety were: psychiatric history, increased workload, contact with a positive coronavirus patient in the operating room, and severe perceived stress. However, the factors significantly associated with the occurrence of depression were: initial training in the management of covid-19 patients, personal infection with SARS-COV2 and severe perceived stress. Conclusion(s): Covid-19 pandemic is causing significant symptoms of anxiety and depression among operation room staff. Primary and secondary prevention strategies must then be undertaken.
ABSTRACT
Introduction &Objective: Patients with long term ureteric stents for urinary diversion need regular changes, done at intervals appropriate for their condition, type of stent and adjusted to stent encrustation risks. This is usually done under General Anaesthesia in the operating room. We present our series of patients on ureteric stents with change of stents done under local anaesthesia in the endoscopy suite as an outpatient day procedure. Method(s): Since July 2021, we started a stent change service for our patients on long term ureteric stents done solely by Urologists in the outpatient day procedure setting under Local anaesthesia. This is done in the outpatient endoscopy suite away from the operating theatre, with flexible cystoscopy aided by fluoroscopy. We review our series of ureteric stent changes including indications and technical success rate of stent change. Result(s): 56 patients underwent stent change under local anaesthetic from 7th July 2021 to 16th Feb 2022, with mean age of 75 years old (range 55 to 97). 24(42%) were male and 32(57%) female. 9 patients had bilateral stents changed (16%), with the rest unilateral. Etiology wise, 34 (61%) had strictures, 13 (23%) had stones, and 9 (16%) had extraluminal compression. Mean duration from the last stent change was 4.6 months (SD = 1.38) based on clinical condition and stent type. 54 (96%) of patients had successful stent changes. The two patients with unsuccessful stent changes had failed retrograde wire access, one with tight extraluminal compression and the other with severe stent encrustation. Advantages of the new service for the patients include avoiding risks of sedation or general anaesthesia, and procedure performed as day surgery with decreased duration of hospital stay, particularly in this time of COVID-19 pandemic. From a resource point of view, this has freed up operating theatre space and anaesthetist manpower to focus on Urological procedures needing general anaesthesia, decreasing waiting time for higher acuity cases. Conclusion(s): Moving flexible cystoscopy guided ureteric stent change from major operation theatre under general anaesthesia to an ambulatory endoscopy center setting under local anaesthesia is a feasible and safe option for patients with long-term ureteric stents. It avoids risk of general anaesthesia, is potentially cost saving and conserves hospital resources.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Modern awake craniotomy (AC) has been performed since the 1980s, initially for epilepsy surgery but expanding to surgery for intracranial tumours (1). Intra-operative magnetic resonance imaging (ioMRI) was first utilised in 1994 in Boston (2), to overcome the issue of intra-operative brain shift during craniotomy, and permit the surgical team to check the extent of resection before closing. The techniques have been more recently combined, aiming to remove as much tumour from eloquent areas as possible. The interventional MRI (iMRI) suite at the National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery (NHNN) consists of a 1.5 Tesla MRI scanner with an MR-conditional anaesthetic machine and operating table just outside the 5 Gauss line. This can be rotated to connect to the MRI table, and the patient is transferred into the bore of the scanner. There have been very few studies looking at iMRI and awake craniotomies, however there has been a suggestion that the addition of the MRI scan to awake craniotomy may reduce the requirement for redo surgery (3), and that awake craniotomies in iMRI may reduce the incidence of neurological impairment compared to surgery under general anaesthesia in iMRI. As the number of iMRI theatre suites increases across the UK, increasingly AC is being performed in this environment. In our study, we looked at these patients and their various pathologies, undergoing awake tumour resections in our iMRI suite, and their clinical management. Method(s): The theatre log book in MRI was reviewed for all awake cases, a longer time window was selected due to the impact of covid. Records reviewed to exclude procedures other than awake tumour resections with intraoperative MRI scanning. Identified total of 43 cases, a number grossly affected by covid interruptions. Post operative notes and discharge letters were reviewed to ascertain Clavien-Dindo scoring for postop complications. Result(s): 43 cases, with an average patient age of 36 years (spanning 19 y to 72 y), gender ratio M:F=16:5. Mode ASA 2 (1-3), mean weight 78 kg (55-114 kg) and mean BMI 25.6 kg/m2 (20.2-35.6). * Most had a single ioMRI except three cases which had 2 scans, and 40% of cases had further resection after the ioMRI. * 44% noted complete resection on the post-operative MRI * Anaesthetic technique varied but asleep-awake-asleep/sedation comprised 88% of cases, with iGel used in 74% and classical LMA in 23%, and propofol/remifentanil used in 81%. * All patients had urinary catheters and arterial lines, no patients had central venous catheters. * Anaesthetic time (WHO sign-in to WHO time-out) ranged from 5 hours to 13 hours10 minutes with an average of 8 hours 54 minutes. * Postoperative destination was overnight recovery in 76%, HDU in 14%, and the remainder direct to the ward, where length of stay mean was 10.5 days (though mode was 4 d). * Clavien-Dindo score on discharge was 0 in 40%, 1 in 50%, 2 in 4.6% and 3b and 4 in 2.3%. * 44% were discharged with no new neurological deficit. Conclusion(s): We interpret the outcomes here as very positive, with a high proportion of patients leaving hospital with low Clavien-Dindo scores or with no new deficits identified post-operatively. It is clear that awake craniotomy is safely performed in the iMRI suite. As is often the case in anaesthesia, whilst we saw some absolute consistencies (such as 100% rate of urinary catheters and arterial lines), we saw here that the anaesthetic approaches were as varied as the anaesthetists themselves. Anaesthetists should be prepared for prolonged surgical time to ensure satisfactory surgical resection.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: At the beginning of the pandemic, I was working in University Hospital of Leicester (UHL), a leading hospital in UK as a speciality doctor as a part of post graduate training in anaesthesia of Sri Lanka. 5 months into the pandemic, I find my self returning to Sri Lanka after the training and only to be appointed as a consultant anaesthetist in a designated COVID treatment hospital. This is my story of converting a normal ICU space to a COVID -ICU. Main body: The pandemic came late to Sri Lanka. Even after 5 months of pandemic, the Intensive care unit in a designated COVID hospital was not ready to accept any patients. Leaving UK, at the peak of pandemic after a steep learning curve, I realised that we Sri Lankans are just living on borrowed time. Being a developed country, UK also experienced inadequacies with manpower and equipment. Looking at a low income country like Sri Lanka, the challenges of converting the space in to COVID ICU seemed to be impossible. Starting from the scratch, with the constant encouragement of the colleges and authorities, a COVID ICU was built at a Base Hospital - Teldeniya, which was situated 15 miles away from a city. UHL was able to increase its ICU capacity within days. Most hospitals in UK did this within days to weeks. The story was not the same for Sri Lanka. People took time to realise the need for the COVID ICU. This made me desperate and sad thinking about the support the ICU authorities had at UHL. Our ICU started with one bed, adding to the total of 14 designated ICU beds in Sri Lanka. This number was bearable, as the number of reported cases were low all over the country. With the beginning of the year 2021, the number of reported COVID-19 cases gradually increased, with more patients needing ICU admissions. The bed number at BH Teldeniya was also increased to 5, but with minimal resources. When the pandemic reached its peak in early 2021, the miracle happened. There was an island wide appeal to donate equipment for COVID ICUs in Sri Lanka. This made people to change their attitude about the disease and about the COVID - ICUs. Generous donors from all over Sri Lanka and from overseas got together for this good cause. With no time, my ICU was well equipped with all kinds of sophisticated equipment. My greatest winning was to obtain a liquid oxygen plant to the hospital, allowing me to use high flow nasal oxygen therapy in deserving patients. Today, BH Teldeniya serves it maximum to the critically ill COVID-19 patients. Now I can sleep well in the night thinking that, my patients will get the same treatment as a patient in UHL. The unit is well equipped, and I can even lend equipment to ward HDUs. All this was possible due to simple thoughts of Sri Lankans. Conclusion: In 20 years' time, I will look back at the time of pandemic and be proud of my journey from a developed country to a developing country to make the difference that would change the fate of critically ill Sri Lankans.